
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>SUPDA | The Thinking Forest</title>
      <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog</link>
      <description>숲다(SUPDA) — 함께 깊어지는 교육 공동체</description>
      <language>ko-KR</language>
      <managingEditor>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/tags/metacognition/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/2026-oecd-ai-crutch-performance-without-learning</guid>
    <title>AI Boosts Scores by 48% While Cutting Real Learning by 17% — The Paradox in the OECD 2026 Report</title>
    <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/2026-oecd-ai-crutch-performance-without-learning</link>
    <description>The OECD&#39;s 2026 Digital Education Outlook found that generative AI raises task completion success rates by 48%, yet students who relied on AI scored 17% lower when tested without it. The separation of performance and learning is the central challenge facing education in the AI era.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</author>
    <category>OECD</category><category>AIEducation</category><category>GenerativeAI</category><category>Metacognition</category><category>EdTech</category><category>LearningParadox</category><category>EducationResearch</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/oecd-digital-education-2026-ai-crutch-effect</guid>
    <title>When AI Does the Studying — The 48% Paradox in OECD 2026 Report</title>
    <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/oecd-digital-education-2026-ai-crutch-effect</link>
    <description>Students using AI completed tasks 48% more successfully. Yet when AI was removed, their scores dropped 17%. The OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 reveals the two faces of generative AI in education.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</author>
    <category>OECD</category><category>AI-education</category><category>generative-AI</category><category>metacognition</category><category>education-policy</category><category>learning-science</category>
  </item>

  <item>
    <guid>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/oecd-digital-education-2026-generative-ai</guid>
    <title>AI Is Changing the Classroom — What the OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 Actually Says</title>
    <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/oecd-digital-education-2026-generative-ai</link>
    <description>The OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 says generative AI can support learning — with conditions. Without proper pedagogical design, AI raises scores but steals real learning.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</author>
    <category>AI education</category><category>generative AI</category><category>OECD</category><category>education innovation</category><category>EdTech</category><category>metacognition</category><category>teacher role</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
