
  <rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
      <title>SUPDA | The Thinking Forest</title>
      <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog</link>
      <description>숲다(SUPDA) — 함께 깊어지는 교육 공동체</description>
      <language>ko-KR</language>
      <managingEditor>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</webMaster>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
      <atom:link href="https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/tags/ai-grading/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
      
  <item>
    <guid>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/2026-ai-grading-tools-teacher-controversy</guid>
    <title>When AI Does the Grading, What Do We Lose?</title>
    <link>https://tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog.vercel.app/blog/2026-ai-grading-tools-teacher-controversy</link>
    <description>AI grading tools cut teacher workload by 37% and return six hours per week. Yet South Korea explicitly banned AI-generated text in student records this year. Where exactly is the line between what technology can do and what it should?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <author>address@yoursite.com (숲지기 (SUPDA))</author>
    <category>AI-grading</category><category>AI-education</category><category>teacher-role</category><category>educational-assessment</category><category>edtech</category><category>student-records-AI-ban</category>
  </item>

    </channel>
  </rss>
